{"id":5136,"date":"2025-12-11T13:36:29","date_gmt":"2025-12-11T13:36:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/?p=5136"},"modified":"2025-12-11T14:20:52","modified_gmt":"2025-12-11T14:20:52","slug":"zenovie-carlugea-despre-revelatiile-criticului-florian-copcea-din-labirintul-artei-poetice-a-jurnalului-simionian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/?p=5136","title":{"rendered":"Zenovie C\u00c2RLUGEA \u2013 despre revela\u021biile criticului Florian COPCEA din \u201elabirintul\u201d \u201eartei poetice\u201d a jurnalului simionian"},"content":{"rendered":"

Florian COPCEA: \u201eEUGEN SIMION SAU MITUL EXISTEN\u021aIAL AL SCRIITURII\u201d<\/h2>\n

Cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de Paul Aretzu. Postfa\u021b\u0103 de Mihai Cimpoi<\/b><\/p>\n

(Editura Grafix, Craiova, 2019, 206 p.)<\/b><\/p>\n

\"\"M\u0103rturia Pre\u021buirii \u0219i Contextul Academic<\/h3>\n

\u00cenc\u0103 din 1975, c\u00e2nd \u00eemi sus\u021bineam licen\u021ba \u00een filologie la Universitatea din Bucure\u0219ti, av\u00e2ndu-l coordonator \u0219tiin\u021bific al lucr\u0103rii pe conf. univ. dr. Eugen Simion<\/b>, recent \u00eentors dup\u0103 lectoratul de la Sorbona \u2013 Paris IV (1970-1973) urmat de o burs\u0103 de studii \u00een RFG (1974), aveam fa\u021b\u0103 de acesta o pre\u021buire aparte. \u00cei citeam cu interes deosebit articolele publicate prin revistele Uniunii Scriitorilor, \u00eei consultam c\u0103r\u021bile (figur\u00e2nd \u00een bibliografia pentru examene).<\/p>\n

Mi-am ales, de pe lista sa, \u201eTemele poeziei lui Lucian Blaga\u201d. La examenul din prim\u0103vara lui 1975, i-am \u00eenaintat lui Eugen Simion lucrarea \u00eencheiat\u0103, legat\u0103 deja, fapt ce l-a surprins.<\/p>\n

\u021ain minte foarte bine c\u0103, \u00een discu\u021bia preliminar\u0103 privind \u00eentocmirea lucr\u0103rii, Eugen Simion mi-a spus c\u0103 ar dori s\u0103 nu merg pe o interpretare \u201ec\u0103linescian\u0103\u201d, ci pe metoda noii critici franceze<\/b>, indic\u00e2ndu-mi \u0219i numele tematistului Jean-Pierre Richard<\/b>, tocmai tradus la noi cu \u201ePoezie \u0219i profunzime\u201d<\/i>. Mi-a fost \u00eendeajuns recomandarea, r\u0103m\u00e2n\u00e2nd s\u0103 m\u0103 pun \u00een tem\u0103 cu \u201emetoda\u201d tematismului richardian.<\/p>\n

Crezul Critic: De la Gust la Sistemul de Lectur\u0103<\/h3>\n

T\u00e2n\u0103rul E. Simion se instruise \u00een Fran\u021ba \u0219i nu numai \u00een domeniul noii critici (Roland Barthes, Jacque Lacan, George Poulet, Marcel Raymond, Jean Rousset, Jean Starobisky), cunosc\u00e2ndu-i pe Mircea Eliade, Eugene Ionesco, Emil Cioran. Despre to\u021bi ace\u0219tia va scrie \u00een jurnalul \u201eTimpul tr\u0103irii, timpul m\u0103rturisirii: jurnal parisian\u201d<\/i> (prima edi\u021bie \u00een 1977) \u0219i mai apoi studii consistente.<\/p>\n

\u00cenc\u0103 din anii ’70, \u201esimpla critic\u0103 de gust\u201d<\/b>, ca \u0219i \u201ecritica formelor\u201d<\/b>, nu-l mai satisf\u0103ceau pe t\u00e2n\u0103rul universitar (\u201emi se pare azi insuficient\u0103\u201d), el milit\u00e2nd pentru \u201eun sistem de lectur\u0103\u201d<\/b> (\u201eun mod personal de a te apropia de oper\u0103, un demers care, folosind mijloace variate, descoper\u0103 figura spiritului creator\u201d). Aceast\u0103 \u201eFigur\u0103\u201d<\/b> trebuie s\u0103 eviden\u021bieze at\u00e2t \u201efilosofia existen\u021bei \u0219i calitatea expresiei\u201d, dar \u0219i \u201epozi\u021bia fa\u021b\u0103 de obiecte\u201d, deopotriv\u0103 cu \u201efantasmele care intr\u0103 \u00een oper\u0103\u201d.<\/p>\n

Reg\u0103sim \u00een sintez\u0103 acest crez literar \u0219i \u00een Bibliografia aproape exhaustiv\u0103 \u201eEugen Simion\u201d alc\u0103tuit\u0103 de acad. Mihai Cimpoi la volumul de fa\u021b\u0103, consemn\u00e2nd bogata oper\u0103 a criticului literar \u0219i editorului de excep\u021bie.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udf1f Omagiu Academicianului \u0219i Editorului de Excep\u021bie<\/h3>\n

Recunoscute \u00eendeob\u0219te, meritele academicianului critic literar, prof. univ. Eugen Simion<\/b>, cuprind o plaj\u0103 larg\u0103 de preocup\u0103ri \u0219i izb\u00e2nzi dintre care am aminti:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • \n

    Membru corespondent, vicepre\u0219edinte \u0219i pre\u0219edinte al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne cu dou\u0103 mandate (1998-2006)<\/b>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Membru al Academiei Europene (Londra), al Academiei de \u0218tiin\u021be a Moldovei (Chi\u0219in\u0103u), al Academiei de \u0218tiin\u021be Morale \u0219i Politice a Fran\u021bei.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Editor al impresionantei serii de opere eminesciene facsimilate, Manuscrisele Mihai Eminescu (38 volume)<\/b>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Coordonator al Dic\u021bionarului General al Literaturii Rom\u00e2ne<\/b> (7 vol.).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Director al Institutului de Critic\u0103 \u0219i Teorie Literar\u0103 \u201eGeorge C\u0103linescu\u201d al Academiei Rom\u00e2ne (din 2006) \u0219i organizator al unor Seminare Interna\u021bionale \u201ePenser l’Europe\u201d<\/i>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cavaler al Ordinului Legiunii de Onoare a Fran\u021bei<\/b>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    \u00cen ciuda unor vehemente critici \u0219i contest\u0103ri, s\u0103 l\u0103s\u0103m istoriei literare astfel de controverse \u0219i s\u0103 apreciem c\u0103, \u00een totul, avem a face cu \u201eModelul de existen\u021b\u0103 Eugen Simion\u201d<\/b>, conform exegezei semnate de acad. Mihai Cimpoi.<\/p>\n

    \n

    \ud83d\udcda Despre Volumul lui Florian Copcea \u0219i Poetic\u0103 Jurnalului<\/h3>\n

    Lucrarea dlui Florian Copcea<\/b>, \u201eEUGEN SIMION sau mitul existen\u021bial al scriiturii\u201d<\/i>, apare \u00eenso\u021bit\u0103 de un Cuv\u00e2nt \u00eenainte de Paul Aretzu<\/b> \u0219i o Postfa\u021b\u0103 de acad. Mihai Cimpoi<\/b>. Este o lucrare omagial\u0103 dedicat\u0103 academicianului.<\/p>\n

    Autorul \u00ee\u0219i structureaz\u0103 lucrarea pe anumite direc\u021bii, rezerv\u00e2nd un spa\u021biu mai amplu interesului acordat de Eugen Simion jurnalului \u0219i, \u00een general, diaristicii<\/b>.<\/p>\n

      \n
    • \n

      Autorul scrie despre Eugen Simion cutreier\u00e2nd \u201eprin labirint, \u00een c\u0103utarea timpului m\u0103rturisit\u201d<\/b>, reconsider\u00e2nd acest \u201edemers hermeneutic de recuperare a non-fic\u021biunii\u201d<\/b> \u0219i ax\u00e2ndu-se pe o anumit\u0103 poetic\u0103 a jurnalului.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Considera\u021biile lui Eugen Simion despre noile paradigme diaristice \u2013 precum \u201emoartea \u0219i \u00eentoarcerea autorului\u201d<\/b>, \u201efic\u021biune-nonfic\u021biune\u201d<\/b>, \u201eeul profund-eul pur\u201d<\/b>, rela\u021bia \u201eEu \u2013 Cel\u0103lalt \u2013 Cel\u0103lalt\/Cititorul\u201d<\/b>, timp concret-timp m\u0103rturisit<\/b> \u0219.a. \u2013 sunt de un cuceritor excurs interpretativ.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Dl Copcea consider\u0103 pe bun\u0103 dreptate c\u0103 din toate aceste c\u0103r\u021bi privind problemele diaristicii se poate desprinde cu claritate o \u201eart\u0103 poetic\u0103\u201d a jurnalului ca gen individual<\/b> de mare expresivitate.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Pornind de la rezerva\/ ne\u00eencrederea lui G. C\u0103linescu asupra acestui gen marginal (\u201eo prostie\u201d!) \u0219i evoc\u00e2nd realiz\u0103rile genului, Eugen Simion ajunge la concluzia c\u0103 jurnalul reprezint\u0103 un gen aparte, bine individualizat de o \u201epoetic\u0103\u201d proprie diarismului reconsiderat estetic<\/b>, \u201eun adev\u0103rat gen literar\u201d, cum aprecia Eugen Ionescu.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Cercet\u0103torul mehedin\u021bean remarc\u0103 marea voca\u021bie de estetician \u201emoralist\u201d a lui Eugen Simion, spiritul disociativ-sistematizant \u0219i talentul portretistic \u00een cadrul exegezelor sale privind diaristica.<\/p>\n

      Concluzii Finale<\/h3>\n

      \u00cen totul, cartea despre Eugen Simion vine s\u0103 confirme viabilitatea estetic\u0103 a jurnalului intim \u00een literatura rom\u00e2n\u0103<\/b>, scrieri de gen ce pot fi citite nu numai pentru \u201einteresul lor documentar\u201d dar \u0219i pentru savoarea acestora de a constitui \u201escrieri literare subiective\u201d<\/b>.<\/p>\n

      \n

      \u201eMeritul studiului lui Florian Copcea este, \u00eenainte de toate, nu \u00eencap discu\u021bii, acela de a demonstra, \u00eempreun\u0103 cu analizele remarcabile ale academicianului Eugen Simion, revela\u021biile (splendoarea \u0219i mizeria) diarismului rom\u00e2nesc\u201d, conchide \u00een Postfa\u021ba sa acad. Mihai Cimpoi<\/b>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

      Subscriem cu remarca privind multitudinea de merite \u00een plan cultural, literar \u0219i jurnalistic, deopotriv\u0103 cu modestia autorului, talentat si exersat critic \u0219i istoric literar, eseist, prozator \u0219i diarist din \u0218imianul Drobetei Turnu-Severin.<\/p>\n

      Zenovie C\u00c2RLUGEA<\/b><\/p>\n

      Tg.-Jiu, 8 decembrie 2020<\/p>\n\n\n

      <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Articol recuperat din arhiv\u0103 \u0219i republicat! \u00cen recenzia sa, Zenovie C\u00e2rlugea celebreaz\u0103 volumul lui Florian Copcea (\u201eEugen Simion sau mitul existen\u021bial al scriiturii\u201d), care exploreaz\u0103 \u00een profunzime \u0219i valideaz\u0103 poetica jurnalului intim pe baza operei academicianului Simion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5138,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":true,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"Published: Zenovie C\u00c2RLUGEA \u2013 despre revela\u021biile criticului Florian COPCEA din \u201elabirintul\u201d \u201eartei poetice\u201d a jurnalului simionian","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":24,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-consideratii-critice"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5136","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5136"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5136\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5150,"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5136\/revisions\/5150"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/5138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/poduridedor.uslr.md\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}